Presse & blogs Un lecteur de flux musclé avec des articles complets dedans :)

❯ Flux Isérois
ROAR Magazine

Tue, 29 May 2018 04:17:20 +0200

The Long Shadow of May ’68

May 29, 1968. Fires are still smouldering on the streets of Paris. The Quartier Latin is no longer cordoned off by barricades, but the French economy is paralyzed: hundreds of factories have been occupied and nearly ten million workers — two-thirds of the national workforce — are on strike. At a particularly militant meeting of the national student union two days earlier, attended by some 50,000 people, speaker after speaker had rejected any attempt at compromise and demanded the overthrow of the government. For a brief moment, and for the first and only time in postwar history, an advanced capitalist country finds itself poised on the precipice of revolution. That’s when the news comes in.

Charles de Gaulle has gone missing.

Shockwaves ripple through French society. The president was said to be retreating to his countryside residence at Colombey-les-Deux-Églises, possibly to mull over his resignation speech—but his helicopter never arrived at its official destination. The government, acephalous and unaware of the head-of-state’s whereabouts, is in disarray. “He has fled the country!” Prime Minister Georges Pompidou exclaims in disbelief, as key ministers and their aides hastily begin to hatch their own escape plans—openly wondering how far they will be able to get by car if fuel reserves are overrun by revolutionaries.

That evening, it emerges that De Gaulle—in what he later dismisses as a “momentary lapse”—had secretly travelled to the French military base at Baden-Baden to meet General Massu, commander of the French occupation forces in West-Germany, to assure himself of the army’s support. The next day, the president appears on national radio to address the French people. In four minutes, he makes short shrift of any rumors of his impending resignation, dissolving the national assembly and calling fresh parliamentary elections instead. Within hours, hundreds of thousands of bourgeois counter-protesters take to the Champs Élisées; weeks later the Gaullists win the parliamentary elections by a landslide. The revolution is defeated at the ballot box.

Nevertheless, the aftershocks of May ‘68 continue to reverberate for decades, unleashing a profound transformation in the economic structure, cultural values and social relations of Western society—especially in the domains of civil rights, women’s rights, ecological awareness and multiculturalism. Today, there is no doubt that we still live under the long shadow cast by 1968, as both late capitalism and contemporary social struggles continue to be shaped in important ways by its ambivalent legacy.

To grasp the lasting significance of May ’68 for our times, we have to place the French revolt in its proper world-historical context. In a way, the événements de mai were merely one of the most visible and most spectacular expressions of a broader cycle of struggles unfolding across the globe—stretching all the way back to the anti-colonial wars in Algeria and Vietnam and including the Cuban Revolution, the Black Power and Civil Rights movements, the antiwar demonstrations and student revolts from Berkeley to Berlin, the Hungarian and Czechoslovak opposition to Moscow, and the student protests in Mexico City. The events in France arguably marked the high point of this wave of popular revolt, which some have called “The Long 1968” and which the American sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein famously referred to as a “world revolution.”

What made this Long ‘68 so significant was precisely the fact that it occurred at the inflection point between two historical eras, arriving at the tail-end of the trente glorieuses of industrial capitalism—the thirty years of unbridled economic expansion in the wake of World War II—and just before the dawn of our contemporary post-industrial era of globalized and financialized capitalism, whose contours only began to emerge following the crisis of 1973, eventually giving rise to a new era of capitalist development characterized by the rapid ascent of neoliberalism and the reassertion of bourgeois power worldwide.

Crucially, the prevailing forms of struggle were profoundly shaped by this historical conjuncture. On the one hand, the Long 1968 constituted the last great outbreak of industrial proletarian revolt in the West. Of course there was to be plenty of worker militancy in subsequent decades, but the widespread mobilizations of May ’68 were never again to be rivalled in their volume or resolve. On the other hand, the revolt also marked the birth of what the French sociologist Alain Touraine—who taught at Nanterre in May ‘68—would later come to call the nouveaux mouvements sociaux.

While the former, the classical labor movement, was principally motivated by material and economic concerns, like higher wages and better working conditions, Touraine and his colleagues saw in the new social movements a novel set of “post-material” concerns surrounding issues of identity, civil rights and individual self-realization. It was precisely from the confluence of the two that the revolts of 1968 derived their unique character, expressed in the simultaneous mobilization of radicalized middle-class students and a rebellious industrial working class. At the same time, however, it was precisely the inability of these diverse social forces to bridge their contrasting interests and worldviews that ultimately left the revolt vulnerable to cooptation.

The French revolt of May ‘68 was nipped in the bud by a combination of right-wing counter-mobilization, crass electoralism on the part of the Communist Party, and the government’s material concessions to the working class. By the early 1970s, however, it was clear that Western capitalism generally remained mired in a profound crisis; one that was both structural and ideological in nature, expressing itself in the form of economic stagnation and towering inflation on the one hand, and a profound lack of legitimation on the other. In short, powerful social movements, trade unions and left-wing parties were making redistributive demands on the democratic system that political leaders simply could not fulfill within the confines of a stagnant capitalist economy.

It was in this context that ideological hardliners within the academic, corporate and political establishment launched their definitive counter-offensive. It began, of course, with Pinochet’s US-backed coup d’état in Chile in 1973, which overthrew Allende’s democratic socialist government—undoubtedly the left’s most successful electoral experiment during the Long 1968. From there the backlash soon spread to the capitalist heartland. In 1975, the Trilateral Commission published a report, The Crisis of Democracy, which infamously claimed that the West’s stagnant economies, conflict-ridden societies and paralyzed political systems suffered from an “excess of democracy,” and that only an assault on social rights and the organized power of labor could restore the vitality of capitalist democracies.

Under Thatcher and Reagan, the UK and US soon answered the call. Meanwhile, Mitterand’s volte-face in the early 1980s—from his pursuit of a socialist experiment inspired in part by Allende’s, to a full-fledged embrace of free-market principles—lauded the end of the Long 1968 in France. By the mid-1980s, the neoliberal counterrevolution was in full swing across large swathes of the globe, thanks in no small part to the Structural Adjustment Programs that were actively imposed on the developing countries by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund during the international debt crisis.

In the Western world, the neoliberal counterrevolution of the 1980s achieved two crucial political objectives: it successfully smashed the organized power of labor—not shunting the use of force in its assault on the unions—while at the same time successfully coopting some of the more individualistic and hedonistic lifestyle elements of the ’68 generation. A shallow commitment to “identity politics” and “ecological consciousness” was partly integrated into a technocratic conceptualization of politics that effectively reduced the purpose of liberal democracy to the stable management of the capitalist economy.

At the same time, the neoliberal counterrevolution also pursued three fixes for the economic crisis that had plagued the OECD countries throughout the 1970s. First, the “technological fix” of containerization and information and communication technology enabled a vast expansion of international trade and finance. Second, a “spatial fix” opened national borders to the free flow of capital, enabling the offshoring of industrial production to the East. Third, a “financial fix” deregulated credit markets to unleash the power of finance over households, firms and governments—making available future resources, in the form of cheap credit, to paper over stagnant wages, falling profits and limited tax revenues. In the process, capitalism’s structural crisis and legitimation problems were temporarily resolved at the expense of popular power, leading to a vast build-up of debt, inequality and popular frustrations within the system.

By the early 1990s, the collapse of state-communism and the Soviet Union confined Marxism and class struggle to the dustbin of history—henceforth, we were to live in an interconnected and peaceful world at “the end of history” instead, one in which “free markets” would reign supreme and the only battles that remained to be fought would be between a culturally conservative center-right and a culturally progressive center-left, over purely “post-material” issues like abortion, gay marriage and what to do about the hole in the ozone layer. This was to become the heyday of the Third Way, in which social-democratic and left-liberal exponents of soixante-huitardist values like Clinton and Blair embraced the prevalent dogma of market liberalization to become the uncontested figureheads of a now thoroughly depoliticized ’68 generation.

The dream lasted for about a decade—until the world was rocked by the 9/11 attacks and the Bush administration’s neoconservative Project for an American Century. Neoliberalism had always depended on a strong state to “make society fit for the free market,” but the newfound obsession with national security radicalized this reliance on state authority. Through the War on Terror, global trade and financial markets now came to be embedded in a draconian project of border security, mass surveillance and foreign intervention. As the Western world turned on Muslim populations at home and abroad, even the diluted and fully coopted cultural spirit of ’68 came under sustained attack from the xenophobic far-right, which ironically began to wield some of its gains—like women’s rights—as a club with which to beat the Muslim neighbor and dismantle the multicultural open society of the post-’68 era.

But it was really only with the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, exactly 10 years ago this fall, that the neoliberal illusions of a democratic and capitalist end of history were properly shattered. In  a remarkable turn of events, the decade since the start of the global financial crisis was to be characterized by Marx’s revenge: as is now plain for everyone to see, and as even establishment publications like The Economist were compelled to recognize on the 200th anniversary of Marx’s birth earlier in May, capitalism remains subject to potentially catastrophic periodic crises, to rampant inequality, to widespread alienation—and, from time to time, even to violent revolutionary upheaval.

All of this became acutely evident in 2011, when popular revolts—driven in large part by socio-economic concerns resulting from high youth unemployment and skyrocketing food and energy prices—broke out across the Arab world, unseating dictators in Tunisia and Egypt and spreading like a wildfire through North Africa and the Middle East. Soon the “spirit of Tahrir” crossed the Mediterranean, as millions of Spaniards and Greeks—inspired by the Egyptian Revolution—occupied their own city squares in protest against the austerity measures imposed by European lenders and the IMF. Several months later, the Occupy Wall Street movement briefly took the world by storm, and in the next years uprisings in countries like Turkey and Brazil showed that rapidly growing emerging markets were not immune to social unrest either.

After 2011, it became clear that in today’s globalized and financialized world, class struggle is alive and well—even if its forms have changed in a number of important ways as a result of the transformations of capitalism and work over the past four decades. Contemporary class struggles still fundamentally revolve against the opposition between those who own capital and those who have to sell their labor power in order to survive, but they no longer take place exclusively at the point of production (they arguably never did, but this was nevertheless long the privileged site of struggle for the dominant Marxist and anarcho-syndicalist traditions). Today’s struggles also crucially unfold in the relationship between debtors and creditors; between tenants and landlords; between taxpayers and state financiers. The field of action, in short, has become significantly greater and much more complex to navigate.

Moreover, as activists involved in the women’s movement, in refugee and migrant movements, and in the movement for black lives have convincingly argued in recent years, contemporary forms of class struggle should also not be seen in isolation from the concurrent struggles against patriarchy, border imperialism or white privilege and white supremacy. While the latter exist as relatively autonomous structures and logics of domination, they are nevertheless profoundly intertwined with—and ultimately inseparable from—the capitalist social relations of our time.

A key insight emerging from this new cycle of struggles, then, is one that was already present among some of the most radical elements of the Long ’68—namely the realization that dynamics of class struggle and the logic of identity politics cannot be simplistically opposed as alternatives. To be successful, both forms of struggle need to be waged together, at the same time, while allowing for the self-determination and relative autonomy of those groups that continue to suffer multiple layers of oppression. In short, the political objective of the anti-capitalist struggle cannot be limited to a narrowly construed form of socio-economic equality, nor can emancipatory claims be limited to the liberal domain of “equal rights.” The revolutionary politics of the twenty-first century will be for collective liberation from intersecting systems of domination.

Today, we find ourselves at yet another inflection point: between an old world that is dying and a new one that cannot yet be born—with all kinds of morbid symptoms arising from the breach. It is now apparent that the credit-fuelled neoliberal counterrevolution to the Long 1968 is rapidly running out of steam. After the crash of 2008, only an unprecedented wave of bank bailouts and money creation by the world’s leading governments and central banks could provide the capitalist system with a lease of life. Now, the last-remaining legitimacy of the neoliberal establishment is evaporating like mist in the morning sun, as signs of an impending general crisis emerge all around it.

The prevailing mood in today’s social movements is therefore very different from that of ’68. It is certainly not one of untrammelled optimism about the power of the imagination, nor does it make any illusions about the existence of a beach beneath the cobblestones. Rather, our historical moment appears to be characterized by an unprecedented sense of urgency. With the rise of the far-right and the existential threats posed by climate change and ecological destruction, this generation knows that it cannot afford for its struggles to succumb to nostalgia or be coopted and defused in the same way as the spirit of ’68. In the face of a potentially dystopian future, the left still retains a small window of opportunity to begin to turn the tables—but only if it can learn to move beyond some of the ambivalent legacies it has inherited. As a slogan that appeared on a city wall in Athens in 2008 put it: “Fuck May ’68. Fight now.”

Help sustain ROAR Magazine

ROAR is 100% reader-funded.

Mon, 14 May 2018 12:41:25 +0200

The revenge against the commons of the ZAD

This is a long-read by one of the inhabitants of the Zone à Défendre (ZAD) of Notre-Dame-des-Landes, about the rollercoaster fortnight of rural riots that has just taken place to evict the liberated territory in western France. It’s been incredibly intense and hard to find a moment to write, but we did our best. This is simply one viewpoint; there are over 1,000 people on the ZAD at the moment and every one of them could tell a different story. Thanks to all the friends and comrades who helped by sharing their stories, rebel spirits and lemon juice against the teargas.

“We must bring into being the world we want to defend. These cracks where people find each other to build a beautiful future are important. This is how the zad is a model.”
Naomi Klein

“What is happening at Notre-Dame-des-Landes illustrates a conflict that concerns the whole world.”
Raoul Vaneigem


he police helicopter hovers above, its bone-rattling clattering never seems to stop. At night its long godlike finger of light penetrates our cabins and farmhouses. It has been so hard to sleep this last week. Even dreaming, it seems, is a crime on the ZAD. And that’s the point: these 4,000 acres of autonomous territory, this Zone to Defend, has existed despite capitalism and the state for nearly a decade — and no government can allow such a place to flourish. All territories that are inhabited by people who bridge the gap between dream and action have to be crushed before their hope begins to spread. This is why France’s biggest police operation since May 1968, at a cost of 400,000 euros a day, has been trying to evict us with its 2,500 gendarmes, armoured vehicles (APCs), bulldozers, rubber bullets, drones, 200 cameras and 11,000 teargas canisters and stun grenades fired since the operation began at 3:20am on the morning of April 9.

The state said that these would be “targeted evictions,” claiming that there were up to 80 “radical” Zadists who would be hunted down, and that the rest, the “good” Zadists, would have to legalize or face the same fate. The good Zadist was a caricature of the gentle “neo-rural farmer” returning to the land; the bad, an ultra-violent revolutionary, just there to make trouble. Of course this was a fantasy vision to feed the state’s primary strategy: to divide this diverse popular movement that has managed to defeat three different French governments and win France’s biggest political victory of a generation: the abandonment of the construction of the international airport of Notre-Dames-des-Landes.


A map of the common projects of the ZAD. (March 2018)


La Boite Noir (the Black Box), one of the cabins destroyed. (photo: Immo Klink)

The ZAD was initially set up as a protest against the building of a new airport for the city of Nantes, following a letter by residents distributed during a climate camp in 2009, which invited people to squat the land and buildings: “because,” as they wrote, “only an inhabited territory can be defended.” Over the years this territory earmarked for a mega-infrastructure project evolved into Europe’s largest laboratory of commoning. Before the French state started to bulldoze our homes, there were 70 different living spaces and 300 inhabitants nestled into this checkerboard landscape of forest, fields and wetlands. Alternative ways of living with each other, fellow species and the world are experimented with 24/7.

From making our own bread to running a pirate radio station, planting herbal medicine gardens to making rebel camembert, a rap-recording studio to a pasta-production workshop, an artisanal brewery to two blacksmiths forges, a communal justice system to a library and even a full-scale working lighthouse — the ZAD has become a new commune for the twenty-first century. Messy and bemusing, this beautifully imperfect utopia in resistance against an airport and its world has been supported by a radically diverse popular movement, bringing together tens of thousands of anarchists and farmers, unionists and naturalists, environmentalists and students, locals and revolutionaries of every flavor. But everything changed on January 17, 2018, when the French prime minister appeared on TV to cancel the airport project and in the same breath say that the ZAD, the “outlaw zone,” would be evicted and law and order restored.


Prime Minister Eduard Phillipe & the ministers of Interior & of Ecological Transition, declare the end of the Airport and eviction of the zad. January 2018

I am starting to write eight days into the attack — it’s Tuesday the 17th of April, my diary tells me, but days, dates even hours of the day seem to merge into a muddled bath of adrenaline-soaked intensity, so hard to capture with words. We are so tired, bruised and many badly injured. Medics have counted 270 injuries so far. Lots due to the impact of rubber bullets, but most from the sharp metal and plastic shrapnel shot from the stun and concussion grenades whose explosions punctuate the spring symphony of birdsong. Similar grenades killed 21-year-old ecological activist Remi Fraise during protests against an agro-industrial damn in 2014.

Evictions begin, robocops invade the bocage.

The ZAD’s welcome and information center, still dominated by a huge hand-painted map of the zone, has been transformed into a field hospital. Local doctors have come in solidarity working with action medic crews, volunteer acupuncturists and healers of all sorts, and the comrades ambulance is parked outside. The police have even delayed ambulances leaving the zone with injured people in them, and when its the gendarmerie that evacuates seriously injured protesters from the area sometimes they have been abandoning them in the street far from the hospital or in one case in front of a psychiatric clinic.

The welcome centre of the zad.
Now a field hospital. (photo: ZAD_NDDL)

The thousands of acts of solidarity have been a life-line for us, including sabotaged French consulate parkings in Munich to local pensioners bringing chocolate bars, musicians sending in songs they composed to demonstrations by Zapatistas in Chiapas, banners in front of French embassies everywhere — from Dehli to New York, a giant message carved in the sand of a New Zealand beach and even scuba divers with an underwater banner. Here on the zone three activist field kitchens have come to feed us, architects have written a column deploring the destruction of unique forms of habitat signed by 50,000 people and locals have been offering storage for the safe-keeping of our belongings.

A true culture of resistance has evolved in parallel with the ZAD over the years. Not many people are psychologically or physically prepared to fight on the barricades, but thousands are ready to give material support in all its forms, and this is the foundation of any struggle that wants to win. It means opening up to those who might be different, those who might not have the same revolutionary analysis as us, those who some put in their box named “reformist,” but this is what building a composition is all about, it is how we weave a true ecology of resistance. As a banner reads on one of the squatted farmhouses here, Pas de barricadières sans cuisiniers — “there are no women on the barricades without men in the kitchen.”

One of the zad’s two bakeries continues to churn out bread.

Today has been one of the calmest since the start of the operation, and it felt like the springtime was really flowering, so we opened all the doors and windows of the house, letting the spring air push away the toxic fumes of teargas that still linger on our clothes. It feels like there is a momentary lull. For the first time since the evictions, our collective all ate together, sitting in the sun at a long table surrounded by two dozen friends from across the world come to support us. I hear the buzzing of a bee trying to find nectar and look up into the sky — it’s not a bee at all, but the police drone, come to film us sharing food, it hovers for hours. In the end this is the greatest crime we have committed on the ZAD: that of building the commons, sharing worlds together and deserting the pathology of individualism.

Two years before the abandonment of the airport project, the movement declared in a text entitled The Six Points for the Zad: Because There Will Be No Airport, that we would, via an entity that emerged from the movement, collectively look after these lands that we were saving from certain death by concrete. A few months before the abandonment the form that this entity took was the Assembly of Usages. Soon after the airport was cancelled, we entered into negotiations with the state (via the préprfete Nicole Klein, who represents the state in the department) following a complicated week of pre-negotiations, where we were forced to open up one of the roads which had had cabins built on it since the attempted evictions of 2012. It seemed that the flow of traffic through the zone was the state’s way of telling the public that law and order had returned on the zone (see the text Zad Will Survive for a view of this complicated period).

A united delegation of eleven people made up from the NGOs, farmers, naturalists and occupiers of the zone attended the negotiations and did not flinch from the demand to set up a collective legal land structure, rather than return these lands to private property and agro-business as usual. In the 1980s a similar legal structure was put in place following the victory of a mass movement against the expansion of a military base on the plateau of the Larzac in Southern France. With this precedent in mind we provided a legally solid document for a global land contract, but it was ignored — no legal grounds were given, the refusal was entirely political. Three days later the evictions began.

The battle lines were made clear: it was not about bringing “law and order” back to the zone, but a battle between private property and those who share worlds of capitalism against the commons. The battle of the ZAD is a battle for the future, one that we cannot lose.

During the picnic action someone holds up a sign “The zad is ours”.
The police begin their operation at 3.20 am.

DAY 1: Monday, April 9 — Everything Begins in the Dark

The telephone rings, it’s 3.20am, it’s still dark outside, a breathless voice says two simple words: “It’s begun!” and hangs up. Everyone knows what to do, some run to offices filled with computers, others to the barricades, some to the pirate radio (Radio Klaxon, which happens to squat the airwaves of Vinci motorway radio, 107,7, the construction company that was going to build and run the airport), others start their medics shift. Hundreds of police vans are taking over the two main roads that pass through the zone.

One of the lanes where clashes take place regularly.
The bocage with its intruders.

Fighting on one of the lanes manages to stop the cops moving further west. But elsewhere the bulldozers smash their way through some of the most beautiful cabins made of adobe and the wastes of the world that rose out of the the mud in the east of the zone. They destroy the Lama Sacrée with its stunning wooden watch tower. Permaculture gardens and green houses are flattened, and they rip gashes in the forest. A large mobile anti-riot wall is erected by the police in the lane that stretches east to west, a technique that works in cities but in rural riots it’s useless — and people spend all morning hassling them from every angle. Despite gas and stun grenades we hold our ground. Journalists are blocked for a while from entering, the police stating that they will provide their own footage (free of copyrights!). The “press group” gives them directions so that they manage to cross the fields and the pictures dominate the morning news.

The Lama Sacrée is the first place to be destroyed.
Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
La Chévrerie a few hours after its destruction. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

There are over a dozen of us facing a line of hundreds of robocops at the other end of the field. One of us, masked up and dressed in regulation black kway is holding a golf club. He kneels down and places a golf T in the wet grass. He pulls a golf ball out of a big supermarket bag and serenely places it in the T. He takes a swipe, the ball bounces off the riot shields. He takes out another ball and another and another.

The 100 Noms being defended on the news of police coming.
Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
The 100 Noms invaded by the gendarmes. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

In the afternoon the cops and bailiffs arrive at the 100 Noms, an off-grid small holding with sheep, chickens, veg plots and beautiful housing including a cabin built by a young deserting architect which resembles a giant knights helmet made with geodesic plates of steel. The occupiers, who have built this place up from nothing over five years, are given 10 minutes to leave by the bailiff. Several hundred people turn up to resist, many from “the camp of the white haired ones,” which has brought together the pensioners and elders, who have called it a camp for “the youth of all ages” and have been one of the backbones of this long struggle. There must be nearly 200 of us, at the 100 Noms, this time no one is masked up. A massive block of robocops is coming up the path, some of us climb on the roof of the newly-built sheep barn, others form a line of bodies pressed hard against the riot shields. We are peasants and activists, occupiers and visitors, young and old — and they beat us, burn our skin with their pepper spray and push us out of the fields.

Bodies in resistance and in the mud at the 100 Noms.
Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
An inhabitant before his house is flattened. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

We reply with a joyful hail of mud that covers their visors and shields. The people on the roof are brought down by the specialist climbers and the bulldozer does its job. A few minutes later one of their huge demolition machines gets stuck in the mud, a friend shouts ironically to the crowd: “come on, let’s go and give it hand and push it out!” Hundreds approach, trails of gas take over the blue sky, dozens of canisters rain down on the wetlands, many falling into the ponds which begin to bubble with their toxic heat. I try to console Manu whose home, a tall skinny wooden cabin with a climbing wall on its side, has just been flattened. My hugs cannot stop his sobs. Our eyes are red with tears of grief and gas.

The mud is our friend.

In the logic of the state, the 100 Noms ticked many of their fantasy boxes of those want to be legalized: “the good Zadists.’ It was a well-functioning small holding, producing meat and vegetables, where the sheep were more legal than its inhabitants. It was a project that had the support of many of the locals. Its destruction lit a spark that brought many of those in the movement who had felt a bit more distant from the ZAD recently back into the fold of the resistance. Of course it’s no less disgusting than the flattening of all the other homes and cabins, but the battle here is as much on the symbolic terrain as in the bocage, and it is seems to be a strategic blunder to destroy the 100 Noms.

The live Twitter videos from the attack are watched by tens of thousands. News of the evictions spreads and a shockwave ripples through France. Actions begin to erupt in over 100 places, some town halls are occupied, the huge Millau bridge over 1000km away is blockaded as is the weapon factory that makes the grenades in Western Brittanny. The demolition continues till late, but the barricades grow faster at night, and we count the wounded.

Before and after at the 100 Noms. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

DAY 2: Tuesday, April 10 – Between a Barricade and a Tank

It all begins again before sunrise. The communication system on the zone with its hundreds of walkie-talkies, old-style truck drivers CBs and pirate radio station calls us to go and defend the Vraie Rouge collective, which is next to the the ZAD’s largest vegetable garden and medicinal herb project. We arrive through the fields to find one of the armoured cars pushed up against the barricade. We stand firm at the barricade between us and the APC. We prepare paint bombs to try and cover the APC’s windows with. Then the tear gas begins to rain amongst the salad and spinach plants.

A friend finds a terrified journalist cowering in one of the cabins. She writes for the right-wing Figaro newspaper and is a bit out of place with her red handbag. “What’s that noise?” she asks, trembling. “The stun grenades,” he replies. “But why aren’t you counter attacking?” she says, “where are your pétanque balls covered in razor blades?” Our friend laughs despite the gas poisoning his lungs: “we never had such things, it was a right-wing media invention, and it’s impossible anyway — no one can weld razor blades onto a pétanque ball!”

The APC pushes the Vraies Rouges barricade. (photo: @zad_nddl)
The gas takes over the Vraies Rouges. (photo: @zad_nddl)

There is so much gas, we can no longer see beyond our stinging running noses. The police are being pressured simultaneously from the other side of the road by a large militant crowd with gas masks, make-shift shields, stones, slingshots and tennis rackets to return the grenades. They are playing hide-and-seek from behind the trees. The armoured car begins to push the barricade, some of us climb onto the roof of the two-story wooden cabin, others try to retreat without crushing the beautiful vegetable plot. It’s over, the end of another collective living space on the zone. Then we hear a roar from the other side of the barricade. Dozens of figures emerge from the forest, molotov cocktails fly, one hits the APC, flames rise from the amour and the wild roar transforms itself into a cry of pure joy. The APC begins to back off as do the police. The Vraie Rouge will live one more day, it seems, thanks to diversity of tactics.

Farmers and inhabitants hold up mirrors to the police. (photo: @zad_nddl)
The armored car about to catch fire at the Vraies Rouges.

In 2012, when we managed to stop the first eviction attempts of the zone, this was what gave us an advantage. Over the 50 years that the movement against the airport lasted, it used everything from petitions to hunger strikes, legal challenges to sabotage, riots to citizens’ ecological inventories of the zone, defensive tree houses to flying rocks, tractor blockades to clown armies. Its secret weapon was the respect we had for each others’ tactics and an incredible ability to try and not condemn each other. Pacifist Pensioners and black bloc worked together in a way that I had never seen before, which made criminalizing the movement much more complicated for the government. Movements win when they have the richest most colorful palette of tactics at their disposition and they are ready to use every one of them at the right time and place.

In a woodland dip to the east of the zone, the Cheverie is still resisting. A huge high cabin made from different types of swirling coloured clay – brown, grey, ochre and white – punctuated by mosaics and carved spiders, constructed by hundreds of hands, is about to be crushed. Hundreds of gendarmes surround it, one of them seems to have a machine gun strapped to his back. From the roof someone uses a traffic cone as a megaphone: “we are defending life and the living.” When the cabin is finally brought down a minor miracle occurs: none of the dozens of windows is broken, which will make it much easier to rebuild.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
Tear gas rains down on the bocage. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

At the Fosses Noires, the brewery has been turned into a canteen, but the teargas is falling on the pots, pans and piles of donated of vegetables. After lunch, a second press conference takes place. Yesterday the first one had brought dozens of TV cameras and microphones from radios across the country, eight people from all the composition of the movement faced the cameras, their dignified anger was so powerful, so palpable, many of us shed tears listening.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
First day’s zad press conference. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

Today there are 30 inhabitants in front of the cameras. It is those who have agricultural and craft projects running on the zone: the tanner is there as is the cheese maker, the potter and market gardeners, cow herders and leather workers. They explain how over the last weeks of negotiations with the state, they handed over documents to develop a collective project within a legal non-profit association that had been set up. They show that on this bocage to think ecologically is to realize that all the projects are interdependent, rotating the fields between folk, sharing tools and everyone helping out on each others’ projects when needed. To divide the ZAD into individual separate units makes no sense.

But the words are not as strong as the striking image of Sarah, our young shepherdess, who like a modern-day madonna holds a dead black lamb on her lap. She explains how her flock was legalized already and that this one died from stress when it was moved from the 100 Noms farm to avoid the evictions. Her grey eyes pierce the camera lenses: “they chose violence, they chose to destroy what we build, they chose to break off the dialogue with us.” Whilem, a young farmer whose milk herd squats fields to the west, raises his trembling voice: “If there is no collective agriculture then you get what’s already happening in the countryside — individualism: eat up your neighbors’ farm land, be more and more alone with a bigger and bigger farm.” He takes a deep breath: “the isolation is pushing farmers to commit suicide. We are more and more alone on our farms faced with increasing difficulties. On the ZAD we hold a vision of farming for all, not just for us.”

The ZAD makes a call for a mass picnic the following day. Vincent, one of the supporting farmers from the region, a member of COPAIN 44, a network of rebel farmers whose tractors have become one of our most iconic and useful tools of resistance, sighs: “the government has broken any possibility of dialogue now. They have forced us to respond with a struggle for power.”

Between the tall poles that hold the breweries’ hop plants a long banner is raised: “Nicole Klein radicalized me.”

A banner is raised “Nicole Klein radicalized me.” (photo: @zad_nddl)

DAY 3: Wednesday, April 11 – Gassing a Picnic

We are woken as normal by the explosions of gendarmes’ grenades. Fighting continues near the D281 road. A small group is trying to stop the police lining up in a field. There aren’t many of us; it feels hopeless. Then out of the morning mist comes a tractor, its driver wearing a balaclava. In the front bucket, a tonne of stones. He drops them in a pile just where we are standing, puts the tractor in reverse and disappears back into the mist.

In the field next door a towering guy wearing a balaclava and dressed in a full monk’s habit throws a bucket of water over a handful of robocops — “I baptise you in the name of the ZAD,” he bellows. A cloud of pepper spray engulfs him, but one the gendarmes slips in the mud and drop his truncheon. At the speed of light the monk grabs it and runs off, wielding his rebel relic in the air. The police megaphone calls out: “You must return the state’s property. Return it now!”

The rebel monk and his relic.
Protesters react as they gather during the evacuation operation by French gendarmes in the zoned ZAD (Deferred Development Zone) at Notre-Dame-des-Landes
The picnic before it was gassed.

At lunch time, over a thousand people turn up to share a picnic in the fields. Over thirty tractors have come, some from far, despite the fact that its one of the busiest seasons for the farmers. They encircle the large Rouge et Noir collective vegetable garden, now littered with hundreds of toxic plastic tear gas canisters. “The state crossed the red line when they destroyed the 100 Noms,” one of them says.

The crowd of all ages walk through the barricades and debris of yesterday’s battle that litter the country lanes. The atmosphere is festive, a samba band with pink masks leads us into the field beside the Lama Sacrée. A long line of black clad police stretches across the spring green pasture. The samba band approach, then all hell lets loose: gas canisters shower down, dozens of stun grenades are thrown into the peaceful crowd, panic ensues, people retreat across the hedgerows.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
The picnic is gassed. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

The houses of la Boite Noire, Dalle à Caca, Jesse James and la Gaité fall in the east. Simultaneously they attack la Grée, the large rambling grafitti covered farm at the center of the zone that has an unconditional welcome policy. There is a car repair workshop, climbing wall and the rap studio and many folk escaping the misery of street life and addictions end up living there together. Farmers’ tractors are surrounding the building, a barricade made from the carcasses of cars is set alight. But the teargas is too strong and the tractors are forced to back off.

Out of the mist of gas come black lumbering troops, they charge across the fields. The whole zone is split in two by a seemingly endless line of robocops stretching east to west. The crowd is dispersed, people are coughing up their lungs, they are furious. It began as a picnic, now it’s a war zone again. The gas clouds cling to the pasture, frightened cows huddle together in a corner of a tiny field. The medic post at the Fosses Noires has to move away to the Gourbi, but then the gas catches up with it there too and it moves to La Rolandière just in time before the police arrive to smash one of the zone’s most symbolic sites, the Gourbi.

In the very center of the ZAD the Gourbi is where the weekly assembly of occupiers is held and Friday’s no-market, a place where excess produce is distributed with no fixed price but by donation only. Initially there was a stone farmhouse there, inhabited by an old couple who were evicted in 2012 and their home destroyed for the airport project. Then a wooden hut was built in its place, but its ramshackle pallet sides soon needed restoring and so a brand new state of the art cabin like meeting house was built over 2015. One night someone sneaked into this beautiful meeting house and set it alight.

But Gourbi was to rise from the ashes, and as an ironic response to the governments 2016 local consultation about the airport project, we held an all-night building party whilst the results came through (55% for building the new airport). To the sound of a wild one-man accordion band doing kitsch covers of Queen and other trashy pop songs, hundreds of people stuffed the clay of the wetlands into a huge geodesic metal dome structure to build our new round meeting house. It was made of steel and mud to resist arson, but today the bulldozer crushed it with a single swipe of its blade. Worlds away in the metropolis, the Minister of Interior, Gérard Collomb, tells parliament: “We want to avoid all violence in this country. This is what we are doing at Notre-Dame-des-Landes.”

The Gourbi comes under attack.
The Gourbi dome in ruins.

By sunset the government claims to have evicted thirteen more living spaces, bringing the total to 29 since Monday. The prime minister refuses to pause the operations, and the medic team share horrific photos of some of the 60 injuries since Monday, including three journalists. Meanwhile the cops release their figures: 32 injuries — but it turns out most are from the misuse of their own weapons.

Solidarity actions pour in from thousands, including squatters in Iceland, farmers in Lebanon and eco-builders in Colombia. In Paris, sex workers send in kinky ZAD-themed S&M photos and students occupy the EHSS elite social science school in solidarity. That afternoon electricity is cut across a large part of the zone and many of our neighbors’ homes outside of the ZAD. It is a tactic reminiscent of collective punishment used during military occupations. At night the gentle lulling croak of mating frogs in the marches mixes with the hum of back-up electric generators. Four hundred of us meet at the Wardine, in the old concrete cow shed covered in bright murals. We share stories, dogs bark, tempers fray.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
The art of the barricade. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

DAY 4: Thursday, April 12 – Are They Ready to Kill ?

The day begins with some good news on radio klaxon. An affinity group action just shut down the motorway that passes near the ZAD. Emerging from the bushes they flowed down onto the tarmac armed with tyres, fluorescent jackets and lighters. Within seconds a burning wall blocked the flow of commuters to Nantes. The group disappeared just as quickly as they materialized, melting back into the hedgerows.

The more we fight for this land, the more we become the bocage and the harder it is to find us. Every day, more and more people converge here, many for the first time in their lives. The art of the barricade continues across the zone, including one topped with an old red boat. Some of our most useful barricades are mobile, in the form of tractors, dozens of COPAIN 44’s machines take over the main cross roads of the zone.

Following an attempt by friendly lawyers to prove that the eviction of the 100 Noms was illegal, the prefect is forced to appear in court in Nantes, but the case is adjourned. The indefatigable ZAD press group sends out a new communique entitled After 3 days of evictions, are they ready to kill because they don’t want a collective? Clashes continues across the bocage as Macron takes to the TV screens for a national statement about his policies. A social movement is rising against him, with university occupations, supermarket, rail workers and Air France on strike — he has to respond. The mise-en-scène is bizarre: he sits in a primary school class room. He speaks about the ZAD for a little over a minute: “republican order must be restored,” he says, and “everything that was to be evacuated has already been evacuated.”

President Macron delivers his message from a classroom.

As he speaks, 150 concussion grenades are launched in less than half an hour in the Lama Sacrée field. The explosions echo across the bocage, bursting the ear drums of those nearby and raising the anxiety levels of those within hearing distance, which on this flat landscape of the ZAD, is all of us. The League of Human Rights demands that all parties come back to the table. A call is sent for people to converge on the zone on Sunday: “The time has come to find ourselves together, to say that the ZAD must live, to dress our wounds and rebuild ourselves.”

We walk home to la Rolandière, with its ship-shaped library attached to the lighthouse, built where they wanted to build the airport control tower. The sun is setting, 20 meters high up on the lighthouse’s balcony a lone figure is playing a trumpet, fluid sumptuous jazz floats across the forest. It is one of those moments when you remember why you live here.

That night under a clear constellation-filled sky, the Assembly of Usages meets. We sit on wooden hand made bleechers under Le hangar de l’avenir (The Barn of the Future). This cathedral-like barn was built by over 80 traditional carpenters in 2016 using mostly hand tools. It is ornamented with snakes and salamanders carved into the oak beams. There are several hundred of us at the assembly. One of the peasants whose tractor is blocking the crossroads reads out a series of texts messages he has received from the préfete who is trying to negotiate with COPAIN 44: “Yesterday the prime minister said it was war, today the president says it’s peace, therefore it’s all over.” It’s clear that she’s feeling that the situation has become much more complicated than predicted. A deal is made: move your tractors, she writes, and I promise that by 10pm I will announce to Ouest France, the regional newspaper, that it is the end of operations by the gendarmes.

The Assembly of Usages meets at the Barn of the Future. (photo: @zad_nddl)

The meeting continues. We wait for the article to appear on the newspaper’s website. I reload my phone endlessly waiting for the site to update. Suddenly it does, but it’s just a story about rock legend Johnny Hallyday. Was it all a bluff ? Then it arrives, half an hour late. A cheer rises from the tired voices. At home we try to party a little — at least we might get a lie in the morning. It seems that it’s over for the time being?

Inhabitants of the zad after another home is crushed.

DAY 5: Friday, April 13 – Utopias with Teeth

I’m half awake, there is a rumble of vehicles on the road… At first I think it’s tractors, but then I see the lights, blue and flashing, van after van of cops passing. We leap out of bed and run to the top of the lighthouse; the entire road is filled with vans as far as the eye can see. The huge barricade at the crossroads, which the tractors left last night following the préfete’s announcement, is on fire, a plume of black smoke framing the the orange dawn. The familiar pop of teargas canisters being fired is accompanied by the crunching sounds of barricades being pushed by the APC.

Radio Klaxon says they have kettled la Grée and are searching it, the Wardine camping is also encircled and 150 cops are heading towards the Rosier. The Lascar barricade, made of several burnt cars, with a huge metal doorway and a trench that is several meters wide, is being defended by nearly 100 of us. The forest is wrapped in toxic mist, ghostly rebel silhouettes run from tree to tree, stones are aimed at the robocops with catapults that were made by Andre, an 83-year-old who set up a production line for us during the eviction threats of 2016, his team churned out 1,000. The cops throw stun grenades blindly from the fields into the forest — one explodes just above my head, caught in the tree it rips the bark into smithereens. Is this what they call the end of operations?

After the battle of the barricade of Lascar.

A communiqué from the gendarmerie explains that they are clearing the roads and are not doing any expulsions or knocking down any squats, but that they are looking to arrest people who fired a distress rocket at their helicopter. At la Grée they take away two people but not for that charge. The gas pushes everyone back from the Lascar’s barricade and the grinders come out to cut the metal gateway into pieces. Despite the rising clouds of tear gas, people on the roof of the brand new Ambazada, a building that will host folk from intergalactic struggles, manage to sing some of our re-purposed folk songs, recounting the history of the struggle of the ZAD.

Then a moment of joy: one of the armored cars attacking the Lascar tips into a ditch and has to be pulled out by the other one. The mud of this wetlands has always been our ally, its wetness our friend. When they retreat a banner is put up: “Cheap APC driving license available here.” Our other accomplice is humor, of course — even in what feels like a war zone, with tarmac scorched, broken glass and rubble everywhere, being able to laugh feeds our rage. The police retreat again and the barricade grows back out of its ruins, bigger and stronger than ever. We notice that where the APC fell into the ditch is now a huge deep hole at exactly the place where the drain for the Ambazada was going to be dug — no need for digging, just put the plants in it to make our grey water reed bed. That’s what you call radical permaculture, least effort for maximum gain.

The mud is still our friend.

At midday the préfete begins her press conference in Nantes. She confirms last night’s message — evictions are over — and in a dramatic gesture, flourishes a page of A4 paper towards the cameras. “It’s a simplified form,” she tells the press, “so that those who wish can declare their projects as quickly as possible… The deadline is April 23,” she continues. “All we are asking is that they declare their names, what agricultural project they wish to develop and to tell us what plot of land they wish to work on, so that the state can process them.” She also confirms that it was Macron who was running the operation, not the prime minister or interior minister; it was he who decided to stop the expulsions. “I am holding out my hand,” she says, and asks for negotiations to re-start on Monday: “I am giving the Zadists a last chance.” Sitting next to her General Lizurey in charge of the gendarme’s operations says that the number of Zadists on the zone has increased from 250 to 700.

Nicole Klein the préfete holds up her form.

I walk through the Rohanne forest to The Barn of the Future, I breathe in the forest air, the sweet pine, the musty damp smell of mushrooms. The barn has returned to its normal use as a saw mill and carpentry workshop for the ZAD. It is the base of the Abracadabois collective that looks after the forests and hedgerows, harvesting firewood and building timber and setting up skill shares to learn carpentry, forest biology, wood carving, chainsaw use and learning about other ways of inhabiting forests inspired by indigenous practices from past and present. The saw mill is planking the logs, twenty carpenters are busy preparing frames for a new building, a new assembly and no-market hall for the Gourbi, that we aim to put up on Sunday during the mass action.

Carpenters prepare the new building for the action. (photo: @zad_nddl)

This morning I was enveloped in teargas and now I’m watching some of the same barricaders without their gas masks making a barn using the techniques that have been used for millennia. It is somehow healing to watch the attentive work. It is this capacity to fight and build, to block capitalism and to construct other forms of life which gives the ZAD its strength. It is also another reason the state wants to destroy us: they can deal with nice clean alternative eco-projects, easy to buy off and recuperate into new forms of green capitalism, but when those who have a systemic critique are also providing material examples of other ways of being, it becomes dangerous. The resistance and creativity, the no and the yes, are the twin strands of DNA of this territory — split one from the other and the ZAD dies. It becomes another eco-village or Transition Town, alternatives without teeth.

Clearing tear gas from the eyes of some zad defenders.
Collective barricade making.

Yet a second helicopter is flying above the barn, this time with Prime Minister Edouard Philippe and the minister of interior inside. They are getting a private bird’s eye tour of the ZAD. They have come to congratulate the troops for their hard work. As he shakes hands with the gendarmes, Phillippe tells the press that “the state will not accept any reconstruction or reoccupation.” He is referring to the action planned on Sunday. “Any place that tries such an action will exclude itself from any possible regularisation… and will thus put themselves under judicial proceedings.” Once again the threat of sorting the good Zadists from the bad. The carpenters work late into the night.

The toxic dawn mist in the bocage.

DAY 6: Saturday, April 14 – We Won’t Forget Our Scars

Bang — another wake up call. The APCs and dozens of vans pass by at the speed of a TGV train, bulldoze the barricades away on the D81 road again, and continue south, probably to Nantes where striking workers are holding a demonstration followed by one against the eviction of the ZAD.

Barricades are cleared at the Lama Fachée at the same time, and a strange new gas is spotted, dark yellow. It makes people throw up, sows mental confusion and a loss of all spatial and temporal senses. Behind one of the barricades, a trio of action medics are keeping an eye on the adjoining woodland where grenades are exploding. “It’s been war wounds here,” they explain. “Skin and nerves hit by shrapnel, open gashes, eardrums damaged, necrosis and bone fractures.” Some folk have over 70 pieces of shrapnel in their limbs, it takes hours every day to pull them out and clean them; some have gone three centimeters deep into the skin. Many of the newcomers on the zone throw themselves into picking up the thousands of gas canisters that litter the fields, placing them in big bags for everyone to see in the “camp of the white haired ones.” Each canister costs 110 euros.

The demonstration in Nantes is big, 10,000 people. The 1,000 riot police on duty attack it and gas people drinking on the café terraces.

Protesters supporting the zad are attacked by water cannon in Nantes.

The sun set is dark red this evening. The wood working tools and machines are cleared aside, the Barn of the Future becomes a meeting hall again for the Assembly of Usages. The fresh smell of saw dust perfumes the discussions about whether we should go to back to the negotiations on Monday. The response is no, not yet.

caravan window
The ruins of one of the collectives.

DAY 7: Sunday, April 15 – The Human Millipede Realizes a Dream

It’s the big day: thousands of people from all over the country are converging on the zone for the day of mass action. The troops have cut off a third of the ZAD, they line the lanes for kilometers, cutting off access to any part of the zone where homes had been destroyed last week. This includes the Gourbi, where we hoped to bring the new building to. All road access to the ZAD is blocked off by the gendarmes. They tell people to go home because they won’t be able to reach the demonstration. But more than 10,000 of them disobey, park their cars and coaches in the nearby villages and trek for over an hour across the bocage. The details of the new building are still being finished, as the crowds arrive, such as a large “fuck you” finger and the face of a fox that are being carved.

The fuck you finger carved for the new Gourbi. (photo: @zad_nddl)

Through the pirate radio, text messages and word of mouth, we tell people to converge on Bellevue, the big farm in the west and wait for a decision about what we will do. Fifty of us meet in a field in an emergency meeting. The farmers don’t want to risk their tractors, we don’t want to have a gesture that feels too symbolic — once again the collective intelligence comes to the fore and we come up with a plan B. The building will be erected as close to the front as possible without forcing the police line; there are too many families here to risk being gased.

Simultaneously we will ask people to unearth the staffs and sticks that had been planted in the ground in October 2016 when the government told us they were coming to evict. It was a ritual disguised as a demonstration, 40,000 people answered the call, planted their stick into the ground and made a pledge to return to get them if the government came back to evict the zone for the airport. The ritual magic worked — that time the government stood down. But now they were back with a vengeance and the moment has come.

The campanille part of the Gourbi is moved across the fields.
Traditional Breton dancing infront of police lines during the mass action.

Whilst people pulled the deeply charged sticks out of the clay, others on lane behind carried the huge wooden frames, planks and beams of the new building to the field between between the Wardine and the Ambazada. It takes a few hours to put the carpentry back together and raise the structure up, meanwhile thousands of people push their sticks back into the ground creating a huge circular pallisade around it. In the next door field the police start to teargas and stun grenade hundreds of people, some of whom had been reading poems to the cops and many of whom held their hands in the air in a gesture of peace. Families hold their ground next to masked up barricaders.

Meanwhile, a handful of people decide as a kind of game to take the campanile, the tower-like addition of the new building, through the forest to the east. A crowd of hundreds follows. We cross the road next to the cops, who charge but are forced back by the mass of bodies. We try to get as near to the Gourbi as possible. The wind is on our side and blows the teargas back into the cops’ lines. But the playful act of defiance ends when it becomes clear that we can’t get anywhere near the Gourbi — the police lines are too thick. However, the pleasure of running through forests and fields carrying part of a wooden building is clearly addictive. A few hours later, once the sun has gone down and the cops have left, a new plot is hatched. Why don’t we move the whole building, one and a half tonnes of it, three kilometers across the fields, in the dark — to the Gourbi!

moving house
The Gourbi building is carried through the night. (photo: @zad_nddl)
The new Gourbi arrives at its destination. (photo: @zad_nddl)

Despite the general state of tiredness that fills our bodies, we manage a huge heave, and 150 of us lift up the structure. A mass of rubber-booted feet walk in unison — it feels like a strange chimera shuffling across the bocage, half-human, half-millipede. One of the carpenters directs the operation via megaphone: “A bit to the left! Slow down! Watch that tree branch!” Lit by the beams of dozens of head torches, the building seems to float above the prairies. We are plunged into a space between fabulous dream and a scene from an epic film. Someone sits on the very top of the building pushing up the electricity and phone cables so we can pass under them. This is what we call the magic of the ZAD: the belief that anything is possible when we do it together.

We half expect to see the police helicopter, to feel its spotlight pierce the night — but nothing. The closer we get to the Gourbi the louder the chants: “on est plus chaud, plus chaud, plus chaud que le lumbago” (“we are much hotter, much hotter than lumbago”). When we arrive, fireworks shoot up into the darkness, a bright red distress flare illuminates the scene. We set the building next to the pilled up ruins of the dome. We light a bonfire, Gourbi has risen again.

Whilst we were moving our house, Macron was being interviewed live on TV, sitting in a black and gold marble hall with the Eiffel Tower as monumental backdrop. He declares that the airport had been abandoned as part of the “ecological priorities of the government” and that therefore our anger is no longer legitimate. Rather than an alternative society, the ZAD was “a project of chaos… illegally occupying public lands,” he tells the nation.

“We have restored republican order,” he declares, at least four times. We must sign individual forms before April 23, or “everything that should be evicted will be evicted,” he says. Macron ends with a ridiculous analogy: the ZAD is as if someone came into your living room to propose an alternative and squatted your sofa. Ridiculous and wrong: none of the land here belongs to private individuals, it all still belongs to multinational airport builders Vinci and the state. But his statement was a new ultimatum, a declaration of total war against all collective forms of life. We return home to the news, but it cannot blunt the memories of this improbable night.

Better than tennis.

DAY 8: Monday, April 16 – We Will Always Re-surge, Return, Reclaim

There are a half a dozen bodies perched like birds on the rafters of the new Gourbi. One plays a drum, a couple kiss, the green prairies below burst with yellow dandelions. We hear the rumble of APCs; it’s obvious they are coming straight here. The glint of riot visors shimmer in the sunlight, a column is moving towards us. A few flash bangs later and those on the roof are brought down by police climbers. The pillars of the building are cut by a chainsaw and the APC drives into it. Like the skeleton of a dying beast it crumbles to the ground. The police leave under a hail of stones, people sort out the broken beams. “Bastards!” a friend points to a stump of cut timber: “they sawed off the big fuck you finger and took it back to the barracks as a trophy!”

The gendarmerie release their drone footage of the destruction on social networks. They need to show some success in their operation — they too are getting tired of this infernal cycle of destruction and reconstruction. A communication from a group called “Gendarmes and Citizens” denounces the fact that they are feeling “bogged down” and feel like “cannon fodder” faced with “rural guerrillas.” They deplore the “political paralysis” of the government who are on the one hand communicating with a “warlike tone,” but are not following it up with effective orders on the ground. “Why are we not being given orders to arrest everyone in the squats?” they complain. So far there have been surprisingly few arrests; we wonder if they will just come back later, raid our homes, pick us off one by one, when things are quieter?

There is a new moon above tonight’s Assembly of Usages. Unsurprisingly the debates are heated, we have to decide to restart negotiations or not. The question has never been negotiate or fight — we always knew that we had to do both — but after so many days of attacks it’s not easy to accept to go back to the table. In the end we decide that we can meet the préfete, not to negotiate the base issues, but make demands for the continuation of talks, one of which is to take the troops off the zone. “You don’t negotiate with a gun to your head,” one of the locals says, but we known that if we refuse to meet, Macron’s machine could return and destroy everything that is left, risking lives and in the end depriving us of this territory where we found each other.

An older friend of mine, someone who experienced the uprisings of ’68, writes to me. His letter just says: “the ZAD will never end, it will simply change shape.” And he is right. This attachment we have to this territory where we have been able shake our dependence on capitalism and the state, is something that brings us together, however disparate our political perspectives. Our love for this huge playground, which inspires us to organise together, this deep desire for the wetlands that lubricates our imaginings, these are not abstractions but feelings that are deeply anchored to our experience of this bocage and all our experiments that emerge from it. It is a place that compels us to recompose, to renew, to have the courage to put our political ideas into question, to always push ourselves further than what we thought was possible, to open ourselves up beyond a radical ghetto or walled-off utopia.

Despite our barricades and the diversity of disobedience, if the state really wants to eradicate the whole of the ZAD, they can. Everyone would have lost their homes, workshops, fields, tools and we would probably find ourselves banned from returning to the region (a common judicial punishment in France). Scattered across the country without a place that enables us to grow roots together, we would lose all our strength. We know that changing shape is painful, but like a chameleon changes colors, we need to find a way to protect this laboratory and camouflage its revolutionary potentialities from the eyes of the state. If we want to stay, we need to find a compromise whilst refusing to let go our the commons.

Bucolic barricades.

Day 14: Sunday April 22 – The Art of Changing Shape

It’s a week later. Over breakfast, Paul tells me about last night’s adventures. “It felt like we were robbing a bank. So organized, dressed in black, head lamps, maps, scouts, etc. Except all we were doing was evacuating the beehives from the destroyed homes and gardens, getting them off site.” He smiles: “we had to carry them full of bees across the hedgerows behind police lines.”

The days have calmed down. Less cops on the zone, more bird song than explosions. The cycle of barricades growing and then being smashed slows down, partly because on the main roads the police bring in huge skips to take the materials away. In the smaller lanes barricades remain.

Armoured cars against bicycles.

The restart of the negotiations on Wednesday went badly, nothing shifted, despite the presence of ex-TV personality Nicolas Hulot, now minister of ecological transition, in charge of the ZAD case since Marcron’s election. He is flown in specially to Nantes in the presidential jet. Following the meeting with us, he gives a press conference in the palatial hall of the prefecture. The government’s hard line is held, the rights of property and the market reign, there will be no global or collective contract for the land — we have to give individual names and land plots by the 23rd or face evictions. In a rhetorical flourish he ends, “ecology is not anarchy.”

Not surprising for a man whose “ecology” involves owning six cars, signing permits for oil exploration and supporting the nuclear dump at Bure. Hulot is simply the “eco” mask for Macron’s “make the planet great again” form of authoritarian neoliberal green capitalism. But his statement shows Hulot’s absolute ignorance of the history of both ecological and anarchist thought. Many of the first theoreticians of ecological thinking were anarchists.

Élisée Reclus, world-famous geographer and poet, whose beautiful idea that humans are simply “nature becoming aware of herself,” fought on the barricades of the 1871 Paris Commune. The nineteenth-century geographer Peter Kropotkin spent many years in jail and exile for his politics, but was renowned in scientific circles as an early champion of the idea that evolution is not all a competitive war of “red tooth and claw” but instead involves a cooperation, what he termed mutual aid. From the 1950s onwards, US political philosopher Murray Bookchin (now best known for the influence he has on the Kurds to build a stateless form of municipal confederalism, taking place in the autonomous territory of Rojova – Northern Syria) brought ecology and anarchy together.

At the heart of Bookchin’s social ecology is the idea that humans dominate and destroy nature because we dominate ourselves. To avert ecological collapse we had to get rid of all hierarchies — man over woman, old over young, white over black, rich over poor. According to Bookchin, our greatest lesson to gain from the natural world was that we had let go of the idea of difference, and reclaim the concept held by many small-scale organic societies, of unity in diversity. Diversity being the basic force of all bio-systems. He envisioned a world that would be neither communist nor capitalist, but what he called Communalist. “The effort to restore the ecological principle of unity in diversity,”  he wrote, “has become a social effort in its own right — a revolutionary effort that must rearrange sensibility in order to rearrange the real world.” For him the question of society, to reframe Rosa Luxembourg’s socialism or barbarism, was: “anarchism or extinction.”

When we truly inhabit an eco-system, it becomes obvious that life has no control center, no hierarchy, no chiefs or bosses, no governments or presidents. Every form of life is a self-organizing form of commons — deeply connected and interdependent, always changing, always embedded and entangled — from the cells in your fingers to worms in your the garden, from the trees in the forest of Rohanne to the bacteria in your gut. As biologist and cultural theorist Andreas Weber says, all life forms “are continuously mediating relationships among each other — relationships that have a material side, but also always embody meaning, a sense of living and the notion of belonging to a place.” The more we observe the living world in all its complexity the more we are able to understand how to become commoners, how to truly inhabit a place and see that the separation between the individual and the whole is a fiction.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
The forest takes over the road. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

“In the ecological commons,” writes Weber, “a multitude of different individuals and diverse species stand in various relationships to one another — competition and cooperation, partnership and predatory hostility, productivity and destruction. All those relations, however, follow one higher principle: only behavior that allows for the productivity of the whole ecosystem over the long term and that does not interrupt its capacities of self-production, will survive and expand. The individual is able to realize itself only if the whole can realize itself. Ecological freedom obeys this basic necessity.”

And so to be really free is not to be an individual able to operate free from constraints, but to be tied to beneficial relationships with people and habitats, relationships that feed you materially and psychologically. Without a tie to your food, you starve; without the tie to lovers, you sadden. We are free because we are linked. Freedom is not breaking our chains but turning them into living roots and veins that connect, share, flow together and enable us to change and evolve in common.

Since the abandonment of the airport, changing together on the ZAD has been a very a painful process. On the ZAD often it is a fight between those of us who try to read the terrain and invent something new that is messy and hybrid yet fits the situation we are in, and those of us who want to keep a pure radical position — more based on uprooted ideas and ideology than the complexity of the present moment, the here and now, the forces we hold and don’t. In 1968, Bookchin asked: “When will we begin to learn from what is being born instead of what is dying?” It is a question still just as relevant today on the ZAD.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
Barricade at the entrance of the Vraie Rouge. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

Things have been moving so fast. After Hulot’s ultimatum, a ministerial announcement suggests that the prime minster and minister of interior are on a war footing. They are prepared to go for it: evict the whole zone on Monday’s deadline, the 23rd.

During the re-start of negotiations on Wednesday a technical meeting between our delegation and the bureaucrats, who look at the case as a purely land-based and agricultural question, had been set for two days later, Friday the 20th. Once again we are on a knife’s edge: this could be the last moment of negotiation before a full-scale attack, an attack that most of us who live on the zone know we can’t win against, however big our barricades.

The Assembly of Usages makes a huge strategic gamble, a paradigm shift in tactics. We decide to hand in the forms at the Friday meeting, but in a modified way, to show that yes, we can fit the state’s square boxes of individual projects if they want, but that on the bocage nothing can be separated out, everything is interdependent. Whilst at the same time making a call-out for people to come and be ready to defend the territory from Monday onwards if the state attacks. It’s the logic of hacking: take what’s there, repurpose it, change its use.

Then one of the most unexpected types of ZAD magic takes place: an office of form-filing is set up in the ZAD’s library, and for 24 hours the building becomes a disturbed ants’ nest, dozens and dozens of people running around carrying white pages of paper, writing on computers, having meetings together, looking at maps of the zone, making phone calls. Comrades with great legal and administrative knowledge help out, and by Friday afternoon, just as the meeting at the prefecture begins, a huge black bound file of 40 different projects is produced, each with a name and plots of lands earmarked, but no single name attached to a single plot. A colorful cartography of the commons of the ZAD is attached to further illustrate the interdependent and cooperative nature of the projects, be they a school of shepherding or the library, orchards or the sports group, mechanics garage or a snail farm, sunflower oil production or bringing up children together. Of the 70 living spaces on the zone, 63 are covered by the forms — only 7 decide not to take this bet of a barricade of paper.

Of course paper barricades are not half as fun as real ones on the streets, but this time they just might be the ones that save ZAD from becoming just another orgasm of history, another free commune which shined briefly but ended in bloodshed, another martyred experiment in freedom sacrificed for the sake of a pure revolution. The ZAD always tried to go beyond the idea of a TAZ (Temporary Autonomous Zone), in favor of a building a PAZ (Permanent Autonomous Zone). This desire is embedded in the solid buildings, the long-term agricultural plans, the vineyards planted for win in five years’ time. We can’t just let go of all the ties we built here, with the locals, surrounding farmers, pensioners, workers in the city, wanderers of all sorts, Nantes students and the youth, the owls, the black squirming salamanders, the knarly oaks trees, the mud. We must hold onto all these deep friendships and networks of struggle that we have shared with such intensity over the last decade.

The state bureaucrats were confused, some enchanted; the préfete seemed relieved. Leaving the meeting, our delegation tells the press that “we have responded to the injunctions of the state because we want to stop the escalation of tension and at last find the time for dialogue and construction,” warning that “if we take away one element of the collective, it cannot work. It’s up to the state now to negotiate.”

As I finally finish this text, the helicopter returns, anxiety rises again in my chest. It spends a long time swooping over the zone, observing this rebel bocage that it wants to reclaim back. Perhaps it is preparing for a final revenge against the commons — who knows. All we know is that during this last fortnight we have fought with every weapon we thought possible, including the unexpected. Now we wait to see if the bet worked out…

On April 26, three days after this text was first published on a blog of the ZAD, the prime minister made a statement announcing a truce in evictions until at least May 14, to allow time for the regularization of the occupants who filed forms. According to the minister of the interior, “everything moves calmly and in serenity, as always.” That hasn’t stopped them piling in with the teargas this morning to clear barricades. The bet seems to have given us some breathing space, even though they remain with the logic of sorting the “good” Zadists who have chosen the “right path” and the bad “illegals” — something we continue to reject.

Evictions in ZAD de Notre Dames de Landes, March 2018
The Lascar barricade before it was attacked. (photo: Penelope Thomaidi )

The government has announced its intentions to launch a second round of evictions on the zad of Notre-Dames des-Landes which could start as early as May 15. You can follow updates on and/or on twitter @ZAD_NDDL. More info here.

Help sustain ROAR Magazine

ROAR is 100% reader-funded.

Tue, 08 May 2018 22:00:46 +0200

Academic alienation: freeing cognitive labor from the grip of capitalism

Sitting in a coffee shop in a typical American college town, I overhear a conversation between two twenty-somethings. They lament, in educated and self-critical fashion, the failure of the academic system. Reflecting on their dedication and work ethic, they keep returning to the same question: What’s the point of four years of rigorous studying, of amassing student loans, of backbreaking night and weekend jobs, if there are almost zero job prospects out there? And, worse, what is their money going toward if not the kind of quality education they have been promised? With most classes no longer being taught by professors but by graduate students or adjunct teachers, they find the US educational system to be a scam.

The experiences of these college students speak to a contradiction at the heart of the neoliberal economy. In the age of austerity, corporations increase revenue not only in moments of economic growth, but they draw much strength from moments of economic crisis as well. Today this also applies to universities. Since 2001, American colleges have seen an unprecedented increase in enrolment of about 5.1 million, with a noticeable spike since the 2008 financial crisis. These numbers are projected to climb another 15 percent by 2025. If education can no longer be considered an investment into the future, it has at the very least become a way of deferring unemployment.

This may temporarily relieve the symptoms of economic plight for students. However, it fails to get to the root cause of the problem: the corporatization of the university. Universities today follow profit-maximizing strategies, including in labor management, that closely mirror those of private businesses. As climbing enrolment is met with a blown-up administrative apparatus, the majority of teaching jobs are shifted to temporary, part-time and contract gigs that are managed from the top. The result is not only a widening wage gap between administrative and teaching positions, but also a new form of exploitation of cognitive labor.

The college students I overheard were describing their experience in a university system in which fewer than 30 percent of professors are tenured (compared to 67 percent in the 1970s), while the remaining teaching staff consists of graduate assistants, adjunct teachers, postdocs and so on. In the students’ eyes, the quality of their education is suffering as a result. Fewer full-time teachers means more modularized courses and standardized tests, progressively narrowing curricula and accelerated rhythms of study.

At the same time, the average cost of tuition and fees has soared over the past 20 years. Today’s students really get less bang for their buck. The price for tuition, fees, room and board for undergraduate students has jumped 157 percent at private universities (to an average of $43,065 in the 2015-16 academic year) and 237 percent at public schools (where it averages $16,757 per year). With these costs significantly outpacing inflation, fewer students can afford the higher degrees they are pursuing and many live a life on credit.

What they may not realize is that the debt they amass is a claim on their future labor. Upon graduating, many will be forced to sell their labor power to the university. They will end up in the same labor pool of adjunct teachers and postdocs that they currently complain about. Their precarious economic situation today will create the conditions for their lives as precarious academic workers in the future.

In making this argument, I speak in part from personal experience. After completing my PhD in anthropology, I spent five years working in higher education, first as a postdoctoral researcher, then as an assistant professor on a three-year, non-renewable contract. I answered to the new demands that are placed on intellectual labor in an education system that values efficiency and productivity. My academic performance was assessed based on quantifiable criteria of intellectual output rather than on more personalized forms of evaluation. And I experienced cognitive labor as an extremely individuated and competitive affair, with my “products” invariably measured by how they furthered capitalist interests.

During those years, I thought of my inability to land a full-time, permanent academic position as a personal failure. This might sound odd given that I was successful in my job as a professor. Students generally gave me good reviews, I carried out research with international partners, and I actively published my work. Yet the academy slowly eroded my sense of self and left me with the feeling that I was disposable. I trace this deep sense of disaffection, which I share with many junior scholars, to the alienation that takes hold of cognitive workers in the corporate university. The failure is not a personal one; it is of a systemic nature.

In its business-savvy state of mind, the corporate university has managed to turn these negative experiences of individuation and competition into an asset. Discounting the anguishing effect it produces on academic workers, universities positively highlight the flexible nature of academic labor. This type of work, which is highly personalized and specialized — a long-term effect of Taylorism — does not necessarily require a generalized 9-to-5 employment scheme but allows the neoliberal university to operate on “flexitime.”

At first glance, this may appear to be part of a noble pursuit of granting employees non-traditional work arrangements that can accommodate individual lifestyles (transportation schedules, childcare, workout routines, etc.) to achieve a healthy work/life balance. In reality, however, flexitime often means nothing other than a non-stop work schedule. In the neoliberal knowledge economy, most academics find themselves under immense pressure to meet standardized performance criteria, focusing much of their energy on the marketability of their work. These intellectual workers don’t clock out after an 8-hour day, and many are in fact running on a 24/7 schedule. For them, there is no end to the workday and no more life outside of work.

This arrangement makes actual labor time difficult to quantify and measure, and it leaves individual workers particularly vulnerable to forms of exploitation and alienation that often go unrecognized. Marx foreshadowed this scenario decades before post-Fordist capitalism was even on the horizon. In the unpublished Sixth Chapter of Volume I of Capital, he warns us of “real subsumption” — the commodification of all human activity. By this he means not only the commodification of physical labor but also of cognitive labor, which includes social communication, interests, creativity, even emotions — all of which must now be considered labor proper.

If we were to argue that academic production is — unlike assembly-line type work — intellectually immersed and seldom monotonous, the physical pattern of this type of cognitive labor proves otherwise. All across the world, uncountable solitary figures have committed themselves to lives in front of screens, fingers moving across keyboards ceaselessly — thinking, typing, producing. For many of these academics, flexitime translates into poorly paid and destabilizing labor conditions. Given that the majority of available teaching and research jobs today are part-time, short-term or contract positions, increasing numbers of university workers piece together several jobs to make ends meet. This reflects the changed working conditions outside the university, where more and more people work longer hours for ever lower wages.

The existence of an academic underclass almost entirely at the university administration’s mercy when it comes to hiring and firing decisions is underwritten by the nature of work in the neoliberal university. Work here is precarious, competitive and individuated. In an academic temp system, the university can draw on a massive pool of under- and unemployed academic workers who are desperately waiting for a job. This gives administrators immense negotiating power, including the ability to reduce teaching hours or discontinue an existing contract on short notice because there are always others who will gladly take the job.

The corporate university advances an economic paradigm that capitalizes on the intellectual labor of a growing “academic precariat” in hitherto unprecedented ways. This leaves many academic workers feeling hopeless and exhausted. They lack not only the energy to produce critical thought that could constitute an intervention into the competitive impulse for academic excellence (read: productivity); they also experience that they can barely set aside the time to organize for their rights as workers.

Of course, academics are and always have been engaged in the defensive fight for labor rights. I have many graduate-student friends who actively participate in labor struggles despite tight research schedules and immense teaching loads, and often against university administrations that oppose them in extremely aggressive ways. Especially at private universities in the US, such as at NYU, these students have fought for years against the National Labor Relations Board decision to reverse legal precedent, according to which teaching and research assistants were to be considered employees with collective bargaining rights. However, while graduate students at NYU were finally able to reach an agreement with the university’s administration in 2013 that granted student workers the right to unionize, most labor struggles in the university remain relatively quiet and personal affairs.

The fact that academics have largely been unable to resist, if not entirely desist from, the corporatization of the university cannot be chalked up to politico-economic reasons alone. It must also be attributed to the mobilization “of a pathos and the organization of a mood” that informs the capitalist system. After all, the academic quest is as much about the accumulation of economic as cultural capital. Even if precariously employed academics may be, in economic terms, best considered part of the working class, their interests are aligned with the aspiring middle and upper-middle classes. At the end of the day, academic desires — for a career, for status, or maybe for some fame — ensure that even the “lumpen professor” remains a professor, cash strapped but with a solid middle-class habitus.

The result is a seeming paradox: an impoverished workforce deeply loyal to the exploitative structures it is embedded within (mostly but not exclusively because people need money to put food on the table). This paradox is informed by a new kind of alienation that does not result from the exploitation of the body but of the soul. It is true that academic labor is not the prototype of alienated work — quaint college towns or sleek university campuses are worlds apart from conveyor-belt factories in Detroit or sweatshops in Honduras — but under post-Fordist capitalism, cognitive labor has become exploitable as well.

If industrial exploitation forced workers into submission by coercing them “to leave the soul outside of the assembly line,” cognitive exploitation is the reversal of this situation. It places the “soul at its disposal: intelligence, sensibility, creativity and language.” Cognitive capitalism thrives precisely on skills that were once considered background noise to production, or seen as curtailing productivity altogether: the ability to make dynamic, sometimes even idiosyncratic, use of knowledge, language and communicative abilities.

Processes of digitalization intensify this use of cognitive skills by constantly requiring our minds to adjust to ever faster and increasingly networked technologies. Like social-media journalism, academic work has become increasingly conditioned by speed over the past 15 years, with the expectation that intellectual output is constant, fast and multiplied immediately. The academic worker’s intellect, generalizable and adaptable, has become surplus value.

Now that the intellect is “absorbed into the domain of economic production,” cognitive labor is no longer situated outside the processes of capital, inalienable as it was once imagined to be. At the same time, the produced knowledge remains largely external to the intellectual worker. Many academics have learned to mechanically reproduce every new buzzword without having to make ethically informed, free cognitive choices. This gives their scholarship a cutting edge while leaving intact the established parameters of existing discourses (take the hype around “post-colonial theory” in anthropology, a field that continues to be dominated by white male academics).

It is possible that cognitive capitalism would look a lot less dire if it did not come accompanied by an utter lack of solidarity among academic workers. Solidarity stems from collective action, where affect meets politics. While academics share experiences of economic exploitation with other workers, the “mood” that organizes the intellectual class impedes empathy. In the university, the feelings of anguish and frustration that I have described earlier have not just led to a quiet acceptance of the fact that our intellectual products are largely subjected to capitalist interests. The inability to live happily with oneself also means that university workers rarely think of those whose economic plight they share — janitors, food service workers, clerical staff, etc. — and often fail to lend support to less securely employed colleagues.

If intellectual labor is largely inscribed into “the machine of cognitive production,” we need to think of new ways of responding to and resisting cognitive capitalism. Organizing academic workers remains essential to the struggle against the neoliberalization of the university and the commodification of intellectual work; the academic precariat must realize that it has the choice as well as the power to fight for collective bargaining rights. Yet, in order to stand a real chance of success, those academics involved in labor struggles also need to devise ways of liberating academic knowledge from the grip of capitalism.

The nature of knowledge production has changed as a result of the corporatization of the university, and a majority of academics today act as “mass social subjects” whose lives are entirely captured by the flow of capital. With the number of publications and amount of possible grant money ranking high on the lists of search committees, and political commitments or teaching reviews ranking low, intellectual spaces are outlined narrowly by university administrators. As a result, many scholars concentrate their efforts on directly productive functions while reducing “unproductive” time to the bare minimum. Their focus is research and writing, so that activities that have no “end result” to show for — teaching preparation, office hours, mentoring of students or extracurricular activities within and outside the university — are sidelined.

The question is whether it is possible to create space for intellectual work that is not purely technical or productive. Can there still be true (or organic) intellectuals whose work is not bound up in the general process of production? Who among us are not alienated from the products of our labor and estranged from one another? Even if we do not want to go so far as to consider knowledge as “sacred” again — as intangible, inalienable and immune to commodification — intellectual labor must be reorganized. At the center should be a commitment to practices that are socially informed and anchored in political consciousness. In the work environment of the corporate university, this means that we should harness these skills — communication, creativity, affect, intellect and interests — to make politically accountable choices grounded in solidarity, instead of merely using our cognitive skills to advance our own standing within the academic hierarchy.

We can come up with ways of shifting traditional work patterns and devising new work arrangements. If several part-timers were to share an existing full-time position, for example, they could work reduced hours at full (or slightly reduced) pay and benefits. That this is realistic shows the recent decision of the German metal workers’ union IG Metall to introduce the 28-hour work week. Similarly, work time might be split up in such ways that everyone is able to find work. A few years back, a group of PhD students in a small astrophysics department told me that they had reached an unofficial agreement to coordinate their graduation dates in such a way that at any given time only one of them would be out on the job market. While this might not be possible in bigger departments with larger numbers of graduating students, it represents an attempt to share access to a market in which higher-ed jobs are extremely scarce.

Other initiatives, such as the Brooklyn Institute for Social Research (BISR), attempt to sell intellectual services outside of the academy in relatively non-alienated ways. The goal of BISR is to make scholarship accessible and education community-based, while retaining its critical edge. Even those who are lucky enough to find a full-time, maybe even long-term academic position can choose to disrupt existing work arrangements. If they are willing to critically assess the degree to which their work habits fall in line with neoliberal expectations of productivity, they can resist these expectations by dialing back the pace of their work habits through counter-practices, such as “slow teaching” or the out-crowding of syllabi. Doing this is also made easier after having gone through the collective process of recognizing themselves as workers, of unionizing, or of otherwise showing solidarity in shared vulnerabilities.

The prerequisite for this kind of transformation of the university is the recognition that cognitive labor can no longer claim to be situated outside of capitalist relations, but that intellectual work is just as exploitable as other forms of labor. This also means that, like other workers, academics can self-organize in unions, teachers’ associations, working groups and so on. It means that they can stand with fellow precarious laborers, such as food service workers or clerical staff, in concerted organizing efforts. By involving groups of different social standing, academic workers can direct their demands, simultaneously and in concrete solidarity, at the various administrative levels of a university.

Rearranging existing work patterns and actively engaging in labor struggles are ways of improving working conditions, but they are also so much more. Most critically, these practices open up spaces that are located at a “distance from capital interests.” They are ways of making room within the corporate university for activities that are not product- or profit-driven. As acts of solidarity, they create human connections, sociality and community.

Help sustain ROAR Magazine

ROAR is 100% reader-funded.

Tue, 01 May 2018 18:35:48 +0200

The world’s deadliest border: a photo reportage

As Europe’s political culture shifts to the right and xenophobic slurs dominate the discourse from Berlin to Budapest, it is perhaps in the refugee and migration policies of the European states that this transformation has had its most severe — and even deadly — impact.

The EU has outsourced its border control to countries like Libya, Niger, Chad and Turkey. Those who do make it through are packed away in overcrowded, prison-style refugee camps where conditions are abysmal. Meanwhile, European corporations make billions by selling arms and ammunition to authoritarian regimes in the Global South. Every German-made tank firing a shell at the Kurds in Afrin; every UK-produced missile or bomb dropped by Saudi jets on war-ravaged Yemen; every Bulgarian gun that ends up in Syria or Iraq, forces more people to leave their homes, their towns and their countries in search of peace, safety and a chance of survival.

All the while, disenfranchised migrants keep fruit and vegetable prices low for Northern European supermarkets by slaving away for twenty euros a day and wallow in filthy slums in Campobello di Mazara, Italy.

European countries have used the “humanitarian intervention” rationale to exert control around the world and to further their own economic and diplomatic interests, through both so-called development aid and peace-keeping missions. In a bitter twist of irony, one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes — the one taking place at the EU border every single day — is treated as a security issue and dealt with in a military fashion, with electric fences, armed patrols and detention centers.

The Mediterranean Sea is the world’s deadliest border, with 33,761 migrants having died or gone missing between 2000 and 2017. But the faces of “humanitarian intervention” here are not aid workers or peacekeeping forces, but an IT-nerd from Cologne, Germany, fixing the wiring on board the Sea Watch 3 — an NGO-run salvage and rescue ship patrolling the Libyan coast — or a lifeguard from the Basque Country who tends to the torture-inflicted wounds of a rescued migrant aboard the Aquarius. And even they are the exception — most people fail to recognize the interconnectedness of the privileged lives lived within Fortress Europe, and the plight and suffering of those locked on the outside.

After witnessing what goes on at the fringes of this broken union, I wonder if all that suffering piles up somewhere? Will those bodies return as ghosts in history to haunt us? Will they be eaten by fish, and consequently served as exclusive delicacies in the top-ranked restaurants of Paris and Rome? Are we eating our victims or just swallowing them? What futures have sunken to the nadir of the Mediterranean?

Dreams and hopes are what continue to drive many thousands upon thousands of scared, desperate and unlucky human beings to attempt to cross the deadly moat that is the Mediterranean, refusing to be deterred by the many thousands that have died before them. But the gates of Fortress Europe are more firmly shut than ever before, and they might never open again. Barbed-wired conspiracies are slicing up the continent once again; brand-new walls and fences have gone up in Austria, Bulgaria, Greece and Hungary, keeping out what’s out, and in what’s in.

But then again, perhaps we do need more human capital to tend to our senior citizens or pick our tomatoes in the searing August heat. A trajectory is laid out in the hallways of Brussels and Berlin. Mare nostrum abandoned, Iuventa impounded, ethics askew. It is suggested that we put a limit on the number of refugees allowed into the Fortress. Meaning that human rights, once again, are negotiable, are matériel for deals, interests and bluffs. But the suffering is ineffable, real, and jarringly so. And it is piling up in Lesvos, avalanching in Pozzalo, and scarring us in Sabratha.

A PROEM-AID boat is transporting refugees from the Lifeline ship to the Sea Watch 3 due to overcrowding, about 20 miles off the coats of Lybia.

PROEM-AID crew is helping refugees to board the Sea Watch 3 about 20 miles off the coats of Lybia.

Volunteers from the UK and Germany help out aboard the Sea Watch 3. Here seen helping refugees board the ship.

A young boy is moved on as refugees disembark the Sea Watch 3.

The refugee boat graveyard in Pozallo, Italy.

Nicholas from Ghana with his son in a Refugee housing facility in Ragusa, Italy. He spent 10 years in immigration detention in Lybia and endured torture. Below: Migrant dwellings in the Campobello di Mazaro slum in Sicily, Italy.

Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:21:11 +0200

Their Land, Our Home

Weaving legend and reality, Their Land, Our Home is a snapshot of the final days of Santa Filomena, an informal neighborhood in the suburbs of Lisbon. The film gives a voice to those whose homes are being destroyed through the government’s out-dated and inadequate slum clearance program. Through their stories we see that the residents of Santa Filomena lose more than just their homes, but also their community, their identity and their sense of belonging. These things, once destroyed, are not easily rebuilt.

Established over thirty years ago, the neighborhood was built by people arriving from Cape Verde and other former Portuguese colonies as well as rural areas of Portugal, seeking work and a better future. People here face
 racism, discrimination and marginalization from the wider Portuguese society. Despite these hardships (or maybe because of them) residents have built a community where people have forged a strong sense of belonging and identity. Residents talk of neither being from Cape Verde or Portugal but of belonging to Santa Filomena.

Now their neighborhood is being reduced to rubble. The city council has sold the land to private developers and is playing the role of bailiff, evicting the whole neighborhood whilst only rehousing a fraction of the population. The reality of this action is that whole families have been made homeless. People are evicted with only a few hours notice. One minute they have a home, the next they are on the street with all of their belongings in boxes, watching their homes being reduced to rubble. People live in fear, not knowing when they will get a knock on their door and be told to leave their homes while the diggers rev their engines.

There are other neighborhoods around Lisbon currently undergoing the same process as Santa Filomena and still more are at risk. For more information on housing issues in Lisbon visit: